Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Ferrill v. Parker Group, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
168 F.3d 468 (11th Cir. 1999)


Facts

The Parker Group, Inc. (TPG) (defendant) was a telephone-marketing corporation that devoted a substantial portion of its operations to making get-out-the-vote calls on behalf of political candidates. About 10 percent of TPG’s get-out-the-vote calls were race-matched. In race-matched calls, black callers were assigned to black voters and given a black script, while white callers were assigned to white voters and given a white script. In advance of the November 1994 election, TPG hired Shirley Ferrill (plaintiff), an African-American woman, as a temporary employee tasked with making get-out-the-vote calls to black voters. Ferrill was laid off from TPG as part of a reduction in force after the election. Ferrill sued TPG under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, claiming that Ferrill’s termination and job assignment had been unlawfully based on race. Both Ferrill and TPG moved for summary judgment. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of TPG on the unlawful-termination claim, finding that Ferrill’s termination had been pursuant to a reduction in force, which was a legitimate and nondiscriminatory reason for termination. On the claim for unlawful job assignment, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Ferrill, notwithstanding the district court’s finding that TPG had no racial animus in making race-matched assignments. The jury awarded Ferrill $500 in compensatory damages and $4,000 in punitive damages. TPG appealed the ruling on the claim for unlawful job assignment and the jury award.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Alaimo, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.