Fleisher v. Fiber Composites, LLC
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
79 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 20 (2012)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Fiber Composites, LLC (Fiber) (defendant) manufactured and sold Portico, a composite decking product that was designed to be moistureproof. Fiber promoted Portico through advertisements and Fiber’s website. Fiber warranted that Portico would not rot or suffer structural damage from fungal decay for 20 years. A disclaimer provided that the express warranty was the exclusive warranty and a purchaser’s sole remedy was replacement of defective material. Fiber’s promotional materials represented that the choice of decking material would influence the appearance of the buyer’s home, Portico decking would stay beautiful and give the buyer years of outdoor enjoyment, Portico products had consistent color and looked like a hardwood floor, Portico products had a quality finish that reduced mold buildup, and Portico could resist moisture penetration from fungal rot. David Fleisher and others (the purchasers) (plaintiffs) purchased Portico decking that became discolored as a result of fungal growth caused by a latent manufacturing defect. Fiber refused to replace the decking under the limited warranty. The purchasers sued Fiber for breach of express warranty and the implied warranty of merchantability, and for violation of the Magnuson-Moss Consumer Products Warranty Act. The purchasers did not allege that they knew about Fiber’s express warranties before purchasing Portico. Fiber moved to dismiss the complaint.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Padova, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.