Fourchon Docks, Inc. v. Milchem Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
849 F.2d 1561 (1988)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Caillouet, Inc., assigned a property lease to Fourchon Docks, Inc. (Fourchon) (plaintiff). With Caillouet’s consent, Fourchon subleased a portion to Milchem Inc. (defendant). The sublease prohibited further subleases without the written consent of Fourchon and Caillouet. The sublease also provided that if the sublessor had to retain an attorney to collect monies due under the sublease, the sublessee would pay an additional 20 percent of the amount due. Milchem subleased the property without the consent of Fourchon or Caillouet. Fourchon sued Milchem for breach of the anti-sublease provision. The court awarded damages for breach of the sublease and initially awarded attorneys’ fees as stipulated in the sublease provision. After another hearing, the initial fee award was reduced to the reasonable value of legal services rendered to Fourchon. To calculate the fee award, the court multiplied the number of attorney hours worked by an hourly rate that it considered reasonable. Milchem appealed, and Fourchon cross-appealed to challenge the reduction of the attorneys’-fee award, arguing that the court lacked jurisdiction to review the contractual fee agreement and erred in failing to fix a maximum reasonable amount and consider all the factors listed in Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 1.5(a).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.