Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
F

Fourchon Docks, Inc. v. Milchem Inc.

849 F.2d 1561 (1988)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fourchon Docks, Inc. v. Milchem Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
849 F.2d 1561 (1988)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Caillouet, Inc., assigned a property lease to Fourchon Docks, Inc. (Fourchon) (plaintiff). With Caillouet’s consent, Fourchon subleased a portion to Milchem Inc. (defendant). The sublease prohibited further subleases without the written consent of Fourchon and Caillouet. The sublease also provided that if the sublessor had to retain an attorney to collect monies due under the sublease, the sublessee would pay an additional 20 percent of the amount due. Milchem subleased the property without the consent of Fourchon or Caillouet. Fourchon sued Milchem for breach of the anti-sublease provision. The court awarded damages for breach of the sublease and initially awarded attorneys’ fees as stipulated in the sublease provision. After another hearing, the initial fee award was reduced to the reasonable value of legal services rendered to Fourchon. To calculate the fee award, the court multiplied the number of attorney hours worked by an hourly rate that it considered reasonable. Milchem appealed, and Fourchon cross-appealed to challenge the reduction of the attorneys’-fee award, arguing that the court lacked jurisdiction to review the contractual fee agreement and erred in failing to fix a maximum reasonable amount and consider all the factors listed in Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 1.5(a).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Legal Ethics

Key Terms