Franklin Energy Storage One, LLC v. Kjellander

2020 WL 265278 (2020)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Franklin Energy Storage One, LLC v. Kjellander

United States District Court for the District of Idaho
2020 WL 265278 (2020)

SC

Facts

Franklin Energy Storage One, LLC (Franklin) (plaintiff) planned to build a battery-powered storage facility to store energy and sell it to electric utilities. Franklin planned it as a qualifying facility (QF) under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA). Under PURPA, electric utilities were required to buy energy from QFs at terms set by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (IPUC). Franklin certified with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that its project was an energy-storage QF. The project’s primary, but not sole, source of energy was solar. A prior IPUC order had established two types of QFs: wind or solar QFs and “other QFs.” Wind and solar QFs were entitled to two-year contracts, but other QFs were entitled to 20-year contracts on more favorable terms. The IPUC classified Franklin as an “other QF.” Idaho Power Company (Idaho Power) (defendant) petitioned the IPUC to classify Franklin as a solar QF. The IPUC granted Idaho Power’s request. Franklin appealed the IPUC order in federal court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bush, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 833,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership