Franklin Energy Storage One, LLC v. Kjellander
United States District Court for the District of Idaho
2020 WL 265278 (2020)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Franklin Energy Storage One, LLC (Franklin) (plaintiff) planned to build a battery-powered storage facility to store energy and sell it to electric utilities. Franklin planned it as a qualifying facility (QF) under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA). Under PURPA, electric utilities were required to buy energy from QFs at terms set by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (IPUC). Franklin certified with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that its project was an energy-storage QF. The project’s primary, but not sole, source of energy was solar. A prior IPUC order had established two types of QFs: wind or solar QFs and “other QFs.” Wind and solar QFs were entitled to two-year contracts, but other QFs were entitled to 20-year contracts on more favorable terms. The IPUC classified Franklin as an “other QF.” Idaho Power Company (Idaho Power) (defendant) petitioned the IPUC to classify Franklin as a solar QF. The IPUC granted Idaho Power’s request. Franklin appealed the IPUC order in federal court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bush, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.