From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...
Frontier Chevrolet Company v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
329 F.3d 1131 (2003)
Frontier Chevrolet Company (Frontier) (plaintiff) sold used cars. Roundtree Automotive Group, Inc. (Roundtree) bought and operated car dealerships. Roundtree bought all of Frontier’s stock, eventually transferring 25 percent of the shares of stock to Dennis Menholt, Frontier’s new executive manager. Years later, Frontier repurchased its stock from Roundtree with funds it was loaned by a finance company. While repurchasing its stock, Frontier also entered into a covenant not to compete with Roundtree. Roundtree agreed not to compete with Frontier in the car-dealership business for five years. Frontier agreed to pay Roundtree $22,000 each month of the five years as consideration for the covenant. Frontier amortized its covenant payments for three years, between 1994 and 1996, under § 197 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 197 governs the amortization of intangible items that are acquired by a taxpayer and held in connection with a trade or business, including covenants not to compete that are entered into in connection with the purchase of a portion of a trade or business. Years later, Frontier requested a refund connected with its earlier amortization, arguing that the covenant not to compete should be amortized over the life of the covenant instead of under § 197. The United States Tax Court held that Frontier’s repurchase of its own stock from Roundtree was an indirect acquisition of its business. Therefore, the covenant not to compete had to be amortized under § 197. Frontier disagreed, arguing that it had not acquired a new asset when it repurchased the stock. Frontier appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Trott, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 553,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 553,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.