United States Supreme Court
417 U.S. 484 (1974)
The State of California administered a disability insurance system that paid benefits to persons in private employment who were temporarily unable to work because of disability not covered by workman’s compensation. The program received no state funding, but was instead funded entirely by contributions of one percent of the wages of participating employees. Aiello (plaintiff) and other women all suffered disabilities resulting from pregnancies. Aiello brought suit in federal district court against Geduldig and the State of California (defendants) to challenge the constitutionality of the disability insurance program. Aiello argued the program violated the Equal Protection Clause because, in defining “disability,” the program excluded from coverage certain disabilities resulting from pregnancy. The district court held that the insurance program was unconstitutional, and Geduldig appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.