George Washington University v. District of Columbia

318 F.3d 203 (2003)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

George Washington University v. District of Columbia

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
318 F.3d 203 (2003)

  • Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD

Facts

George Washington University (GW) (plaintiff) was a private university in the Foggy Bottom area of the District of Columbia (DC) (defendant). GW’s land was zoned for high-density commercial use, special purposes, and residential living. DC law permitted university use as a matter of right on land zoned for high-density commercial use and as a special exception on land zoned residential or special purpose. GW sought a special-use permit from the DC Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) for expansion between 2000 and 2010. Under the zoning regulations, the BZA ordinarily granted special-use permits when the application complied with the DC Comprehensive Plan and was found not to be objectionable to the neighboring community by noise, traffic, number of students, or other objectionable factors. However, the BZA found that GW’s acquisition of buildings in Foggy Bottom threatened the livability and residential character of the neighborhood. The BZA conditioned approval of GW’s plan on measures intended to limit the presence of undergraduates in Foggy Bottom, including requiring GW to house most students on campus and imposing an enrollment cap tied to GW’s supply of on-campus housing. After litigation in federal and state court, the BZA removed the enrollment cap but still required GW to provide on-campus housing or housing outside Foggy Bottom to 70 percent of the undergraduate class. GW renewed its federal-district-court challenge. The district court found that the BZA order violated GW’s right to substantive due process but rejected other constitutional claims made by GW. GW and DC appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)

Concurrence (Henderson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 783,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership