Gibson Guitar Corp. v. Paul Reed Smith Guitars, LP
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
423 F.3d 539 (2005)
- Written by Emily Houde, JD
Facts
Gibson Guitar Corp. (Gibson) (plaintiff) had been producing musical instruments, including guitars, for over 100 years. Paul Reed Smith Guitars, LP (PRS) (defendant) began producing custom guitars in the mid-1970s. Gibson first produced its well-known Les Paul guitar in 1952. Gibson submitted a drawing to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) and applied to register its solid-body, single-cutaway Les Paul guitars in 1987. The registration was approved in 1990. In 2000, PRS began manufacturing guitars in the same style as Gibson’s Les Paul guitars, with slight differences in proportions and size. Gibson sent PRS a cease and desist letter and then sued for an injunction. Gibson admitted that there was no evidence that consumers actually confused the products. Instead, the court found that there would likely be some initial confusion prior to the consumer’s purchase of PRS’s guitar as to its source because Gibson’s Les Paul, particularly its shape, was so famous. Therefore, the district court granted Gibson an injunction against PRS. PRS appealed this decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.