Global GT LP v. Golden Telecom, Inc.

993 A.2d 497 (2010)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Global GT LP v. Golden Telecom, Inc.

Delaware Court of Chancery
993 A.2d 497 (2010)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

In 2007 Vimpel-Communications purchased Golden Telecom, Inc. (Golden) (defendant) for $105 per share. As a Russian telecommunications company, Golden operated in a relatively risky market. Global GT LP and Global GT Ltd. (collectively, Global) (plaintiffs) were Golden shareholders that dissented from the merger. Global believed that Golden was undervalued in the 2007 merger and sought to receive fair value for its shares through an appraisal proceeding. Golden calculated that the fair value of Global’s shares was $88 per share, and Global calculated that the fair value of its shares was $139 per share. Golden and Global both used discounted-cash-flow analyses to suggest fair values for Global’s shares. However, the parties utilized different equity risk premiums and betas when calculating the discount rate to apply in the discounted-cash-flow analyses. With regard to equity risk premiums, Golden used the Ibbotson equity risk premium (the Ibbotson ERP) of 7.1 percent, and Global utilized a newer equity risk premium developed by academics (the newer ERP) of 6 percent. The Ibbotson ERP was calculated using historical data of stock returns from 1926 to present day, and the newer ERP incorporated predictions about future returns. Though the Ibbotson ERP was more traditional, the newer ERP was more supported by contemporary academic and professional research. With regard to betas, Golden used the Bloomberg beta of 1.32, and Global used the Barra beta of 1.2. The Bloomberg beta was used more commonly than the Barra beta, and the Barra beta was not supported by the same amount of academic literature.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Strine, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 743,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership