Go-Video, Inc. v. Akai Electric Co., Ltd.

885 F.2d 1406 (1989)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Go-Video, Inc. v. Akai Electric Co., Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
885 F.2d 1406 (1989)

Facts

Delaware corporation Go-Video, Inc. (Go-Video) (plaintiff) sued Akai Electric Co., LTD (Akai) and several other foreign electronics manufacturers (manufacturers) and motion-picture-related entities (motion-picture entities) (defendants) for violating Section 1 of the Sherman Act. According to the complaint, Go-Video’s attempt to manufacture a patented video-cassette recorder was thwarted by a conspiracy between Akai, the manufacturers, and the motion-picture entities to block dealings with Go-Video and prevent Go-Video’s patented video-cassette recorder from being marketed in the United States. Go-Video filed suit in federal court in the district of Arizona and served process on the foreign manufacturers by utilizing Section 12 of the Clayton Act, which extended jurisdiction over antitrust defendants in any jurisdiction in which the defendant did business or may be found. The manufacturers moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, but the district court utilized the national-contacts analysis and denied the motion. The manufacturers petitioned for interlocutory appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Reinhardt, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership