Greenless v. Almond

277 F.3d 601 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Greenless v. Almond

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
277 F.3d 601 (2002)

Facts

Over the course of the 1990s, many states sued major manufacturers of tobacco products for concealing the risks of cigarette smoking, misleading the public, and causing the states to spend substantial funds to provide healthcare for those whose health had been negatively impacted by smoking. The tobacco companies entered into the Master Settlement Agreement with the states. Under the agreement, Rhode Island was to recover approximately $1.4 billion. Blanche Greenless (plaintiff), representing the class of Rhode Island Medicaid recipients who had suffered harm from the use of tobacco, sued the governor of Rhode Island and other state officials (the state officials) (defendants), claiming that the federal Medicaid statute required Rhode Island to pay a portion of the recovery it received from the settlement with the tobacco companies to the class that she represented. The court dismissed the lawsuit. Greenless appealed, contending that the 1999 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act that amended the federal Medicaid statute had not repealed the statutory requirement under which the class represented by Greenless would be entitled to a portion of Rhode Island’s settlement recovery.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership