Gruca v. Alpha Therapeutic Corporation and the Green Cross Corporation
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
19 F. Supp. 2d 862 (1998)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
Alpha Therapeutic Corporation (Alpha) (defendant) manufactured a product used for treating patients with blood disorders. Alpha was a subsidiary of the Green Cross Corporation (Green Cross), a Japanese company. Alpha conducted business in Illinois, but Green Cross did not. Green Cross had no offices or employees in Illinois. Alpha had sole control over the manufacturing operations in Illinois. Green Cross formed Alpha to obtain adequate production supply but did not share profits or losses with Alpha. Stephen Poole died after using Alpha’s product. Poole’s surviving spouse, Peggy Gruca (plaintiff), filed suit, alleging that Alpha was negligent. Gruca amended the complaint, adding Green Cross to the lawsuit. Gruca alleged that Green Cross, Alpha’s parent corporation, was also liable for negligence. Green Cross motioned to dismiss on the grounds that the district court lacked jurisdiction over Green Cross. The district court had undisputed jurisdiction over Alpha. Gruca opposed the motion, arguing that the district court also had jurisdiction over Green Cross because Alpha was the alter-ego of Green Cross or because Alpha and Green Cross were joint venturers.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gottschall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.