From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Hagans v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
694 F.3d 287 (2012)
Mark Hagans (plaintiff) received disability benefits based on physical and emotional conditions. The Social Security Administration (SSA) (defendant) terminated Hagans’s disability benefits on September 1, 2004, after determining that his conditions had improved and finding that Hagans was now able to work. Hagans appealed and, in September 2008, had a hearing in front of an administrative-law judge (ALJ). In February 2009, the ALJ upheld the SSA’s decision. Hagans appealed to the district court, which reviewed Hagans’s disability status as of September 1, 2004. Hagans argued that according to § 423(f)(1) of the Social Security Act, the district court should have reviewed his disability status either at the time of his ALJ hearing or the ALJ decision. The SSA argued that the district court correctly reviewed Hagans’s disability status at the time the SSA terminated Hagans’s benefits. In its argument, the SSA pointed to an acquiescence ruling it issued in 1992 that interpreted § 423(f)(1) to require a benefits recipient’s disability status to be evaluated at the time the SSA first determined that the benefits should be terminated. The acquiescence ruling reflected the SSA’s internal policies but did not have the force of law. The district court affirmed the SSA’s initial termination decision, and Hagans appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Chagares, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.