Hardwick v. Heyward

711 F.3d 426 (2013)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
H
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hardwick v. Heyward

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
711 F.3d 426 (2013)

Facts

Latta High School (the school) (defendant) had a dress code prohibiting clothing that could be disruptive or offensive. Candice Hardwick (plaintiff) repeatedly wore Confederate-flag shirts to school. The school asked Hardwick to remove the shirts several times and punished her at least once. Hardwick sued the school, claiming that it had violated her (1) First Amendment right to free speech by prohibiting her from wearing a symbol that expressed her heritage and religious views and (2) Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection by singling out Confederate-flag shirts. The school responded that the school had a history of four decades of continuing racial tension and violence, that many students found the Confederate flag to be a racially oppressive symbol, and that the school was trying to prevent disruption. The school also proved that it had asked other students to remove a variety of potentially disruptive or offensive shirts, including Malcolm X shirts that were deemed potentially disruptive in light of the school’s racial tensions. The district court dismissed Hardwick’s claims, and Hardwick appealed to the Fourth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shedd, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Family Law

Key Terms