Harris v. Anderson County Sheriff’s Office
South Carolina Supreme Court
673 S.E.2d 423 (2009)
A sheriff’s deputy kenneled his police dog at a veterinary clinic while on vacation. Both the deputy and the Anderson County Sheriff’s Office (defendant) knew the dog had a recent history of multiple unprovoked attacks. The dog attacked and severely injured veterinary assistant Jennifer Harris (plaintiff), who worked at the clinic. Harris sued the sheriff’s office under South Carolina’s dog-bite statute, which provides that a dog owner or other person who keeps or takes care of a dog is strictly liable for any unprovoked bites. The trial court granted summary judgment for the sheriff’s office, reasoning that when a dog is left in another person’s care or keeping, only that other person—not the dog owner—could be held strictly liable under the statute. Harris appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kittredge, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.