Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Harris v. Jones

Maryland Court of Appeals
380 A.2d 611 (1977)


Facts

Harris (plaintiff), a 26 year old employee of General Motors Corporation (GM) worked at GM for eight years. Harris had a lifelong stuttering problem and had difficulty with longer words and sentences. Harris’condition caused him to shake his head up and down when he attempted to speak. Harris’ supervisor H. Robert Jones (defendant) approached Harris more than thirty times over a five month period and verbally and physically mimicked Harris’ stuttering disability. Harris was emotionally troubled by Jones’ actions.  Harris asked Jones to transfer departments and was called a troublemaker by Jones. Jones chastised Harris for seeking help to file a grievance, and imitated and mimicked Harris’s stuttering condition. Other employees also mimicked Harris’ stuttering disability. Harris sued Jones and GM for intentional infliction of emotional distress alleging that they were aware of his speech impediment and nevertheless they maliciously and cruelly ridiculed him, which caused him severe emotional distress. The jury awarded Harris compensatory and punitive damages, which was reversed on appeal by the Court of Special Appeals. Harris then appealed to the Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.