Haskell v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. (In re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.) (Genesis II)
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
355 B.R. 438 (2006)
- Written by Solveig Singleton, JD
Facts
Genesis Health Ventures, Inc. (Genesis) (debtor) filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization plan in 2001. The plan was confirmed in 2001. In 2004, 275 of Genesis’s investors (subordinated investors) (creditors), who held about $205 million in debentures issued by Genesis, sued Genesis and Goldman, Sachs & Company (Goldman) (creditor), alleging fraud. The debentures had been subordinated to roughly $1.3 billion in senior debt. Goldman held about half the senior debt. The subordinated investors alleged that Goldman and two other firms (collectively, senior lenders) had paid Genesis’s management to understate the figures upon which Genesis’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) were based. The understated EBITDA was used to depress calculation of Genesis’s enterprise value. The subordinated investors asserted that if Genesis’s value had been calculated accurately, the subordinated investors would have received the full value of their notes. The subordinated investors sought $200 million in monetary damages from Genesis and the senior lenders. Under United States Bankruptcy Code § 1144, a party could ask a court to revoke confirmation of a reorganization plan for fraud provided the request was made within six months of confirmation. The subordinated investors asserted that it had been impossible to discover the fraud sooner. The bankruptcy court first held that the claims against Genesis were time-barred. The court also held that the claims against the senior lenders were barred. On appeal, the court’s ruling that the claims against Genesis were barred was upheld, but the ruling that the claims against the senior lenders were barred was reversed, and the issue was remanded to the bankruptcy court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Walsh, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.