Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Hauck v. Crawford

Supreme Court of South Dakota
62 N.W.2d 92 (1953)


Facts

Hauck (plaintiff), a farmer with an eighth-grade education, owned a large farm. D.W. Crawford (defendant) and two other men approached Hauck to discuss the lease of Hauck’s farm for oil and gas operations. Hauck agreed to lease his property. One of the men prepared the paperwork, told Hauck where to sign, and indicated that Hauck was signing a lease. Although there was no discussion of a mineral deed, Hauck unknowingly signed a deed that conveyed one-half of the minerals on his property to Crawford. Crawford subsequently granted mineral rights to White and Duncan (defendants). Hauck brought an action to quiet title, in order to cancel the mineral deed and other deeds that transferred mineral rights. The trial court cancelled the deeds, finding that the manner in which Hauck’s signature was obtained constituted a forgery. The trial court also found that White and Duncan were bona fide purchasers for value, without making a finding regarding their knowledge of Crawford’s fraud. Crawford, White, and Duncan appealed, claiming that Hauck should not prevail, because he was an intelligent farmer who operated a large farm and was negligent in signing the mineral deed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rudolph, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.