Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Brenner

United States Supreme Court
328 U.S. 252 (1965)


Facts

In 1957, Robert Regis (plaintiff) filed a patent application for a novel improvement to a microwave switch. In 1959, Regis’s application was denied by the U.S. Patent Office as obvious in light of prior art. The patent office based its rejection on the disclosures of two existing patents that, when taken together, effectively disclosed the invention contained within Regis’s application. The first of the prior-art patents, the Carlson patent, was issued eight years before Regis filed his patent application and was indisputably part of the prior art. However, the second patent, the Wallace patent, was still pending at the time Regis filed his application, and the contents of the Wallace patent were not publicly available until 43 days after Regis’s application date. Regis responded with an appeal to the Patent Office Board of Appeals (POBA), claiming that the Wallace patent should not have been considered prior art, because the information contained in the application was not public and could not have been discovered prior to Regis’s application date. POBA affirmed the decision of the patent office, and Regis brought a claim in district court to override POBA’s decision. The district court agreed with POBA and dismissed the complaint. The court of appeals affirmed the district court decision, and Regis appealed the decision.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.