Heaton v. Ford Motor Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
248 Or. 467, 435 P.2d 806 (1967)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Heaton (plaintiff) purchased a new Ford truck for regular, every day driving on the roadways and for use in hunting and other off-road activities. While driving on a highway at normal speed, Heaton’s truck hit a rock about five or six inches in diameter. The truck operated normally for about 35 miles thereafter, but then suddenly left the road and tipped over. It was later learned that the rim of one of the truck’s wheels was separated from the “spider” – the interior portion of the wheel that is attached to the rim. There was also a large dent in the rim and a five-inch cut in the inner tube at a spot within the tire that was adjacent to the dent in the rim. Heaton sued Ford Motor Company (Ford) (defendant) claiming the truck was defective. The trial court entered a judgment of involuntary nonsuit against Heaton, and Heaton appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Goodwin, J.)
Dissent (O’Connell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.