From our private database of 37,100+ case briefs...
Henson v. City of Dundee
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
682 F.2d 897 (1982)
Facts
Barbara Henson (plaintiff) was a police dispatcher in Dundee, Florida (defendant), in 1975. While working at the five-officer police department, Henson was sexually harassed by the chief of police, John Sellgren. Sellgren made demeaning sexual inquiries and requests to Henson and her female coworker, Dicks. Henson complained to the city manager, Jane Eden, who did not take any action. Sellgren placed Henson on a two-day suspension for violating the prohibition on eating food in the dispatch room, which was not typically enforced. Henson interpreted the suspension as a warning from Sellgren that she should accept his requests for sex or risk termination. Additionally, Sellgren told Henson that if she complied with his sexual requests, then he would help her gain approval from Eden to enter the police academy. During the two years Henson worked at the department, two male dispatchers were sent to the police academy. Henson resigned on January 28, 1977, out of the fear that she would be fired if she did not comply with Sellgren’s requests. Henson sued Dundee in a federal district court. Henson alleged that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) was violated because she was sexually harassed, constructively discharged, and prevented from attending the police academy. At trial, Eden testified that Henson was qualified to enter the police academy and that Eden would have accepted Henson if Sellgren had communicated Henson’s interest. The district court ruled for Dundee. Henson appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Vance, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.