Hi-Tech Video Productions v. Capital Cities/ABC

58 F.3d 1093 (1995)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hi-Tech Video Productions v. Capital Cities/ABC

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
58 F.3d 1093 (1995)

Facts

Hi-Tech Video Productions, Inc. (Hi-Tech) (plaintiff) was a commercial production company that also made Michigan-based travel videos. Hi-Tech’s owner and sole employee, Stan Akey, hired three crew members—an aerial videographer, a screenwriter and narrator, and a principal videographer—to help him make a video about Mackinac Island. Akey referred to the crew as freelancers and independent contractors. Hi-Tech did not withhold payroll taxes from the crew members’ compensation or provide benefits. Akey did some of the shooting and assembled the finished product. Akey registered the copyright in the video as a work made for hire, which afforded stronger protection than a standard copyright. Later that year, the producers of Good Morning America, a news program of the American Broadcasting Company (ABC) (defendant), sought to create a segment on Mackinac Island’s annual lilac festival. An associate producer reached out to the Mackinac Island Chamber of Commerce for stock footage. The chamber provided two videos, one of which was Hi-Tech’s video. Shots from the video were incorporated into the segment. Hi-Tech brought a copyright-infringement action in federal district court. The court found that Hi-Tech’s copyright was validly registered as a work made for hire—the crew members being employees of Hi-Tech, rather than independent contractors—in large part because of the degree of control that Hi-Tech exercised over the crew. ABC appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Batchelder, J.)

Dissent (Jones, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership