Horak v. Argosy Gaming Co.
Iowa Supreme Court
648 N.W.2d 137 (2002)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Leticia Morales, Juan Jurado, and Gerardo Graciano drove in Morales’s car to the Belle of Sioux City riverboat casino, which was owned by Argosy Gaming Company (Argosy) (defendant). Over a three-to-four-hour period, Morales drank cocktails while playing slot machines in the casino. Morales became inebriated and loud and was forcibly removed from the casino by security personnel. Graciano had not been drinking and was tasked with driving Morales and Jurado home in Morales’s car. However, after Morales became upset with Graciano’s driving, Graciano and Jurado left the car and walked to a convenience store. While Graciano and Jurado were in the store, Morales was involved in a high-speed rollover accident and killed. At the time of the accident, Morales’s blood-alcohol content was more than twice Iowa’s legal limit. Shelly Horak (plaintiff), the administrator of Morales’s estate, sued Argosy on behalf of Morales’s three minor children. The suit alleged that Argosy had violated Iowa’s Dramshop Act (the act) by selling and serving intoxicants to Morales. Argosy asserted that federal admiralty law applied and preempted Horak’s state-law dramshop claim, even though there was no federal maritime dramshop statute or uniform body of maritime caselaw imposing common-law dramshop liability. The trial court rejected Argosy’s argument, and the case went to trial. A jury found Argosy liable and awarded $1.25 million for loss of parental consortium. Argosy appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Neuman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.