Hutcherson v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
667 F.3d 1066 (2012)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Rebecca Hutcherson (plaintiff) was the daughter of John and Betty Hutcherson. Betty was in long-term residential care in a nursing facility. Betty applied for Medicaid long-term care coverage from the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration (AHCCCS) (defendant). To meet Arizona’s Medicaid eligibility requirements, Betty and John spent down assets by purchasing a $100,000 irrevocable, nontransferable annuity for John. The annuity gave John fixed monthly payments. AHCCCS was named as the annuity’s first remainder beneficiary. When John died, the annuity had $75,000 remaining. AHCCCS then used the monthly payments to cover Betty’s care. Because the monthly annuity payments exceeded Betty’s monthly care costs, AHCCCS used the excess funds to reimburse itself for the approximately $24,000 it had spent on Betty’s care before John’s death. After Betty stopped receiving Medicaid benefits, AHCCCS used the annuity funds to cover the remainder of Betty’s $24,000 balance then released the annuity to Rebecca. Rebecca sued AHCCCS, arguing that (1) AHCCCS could not use John’s annuity to cover Betty’s care costs; and (2) even if AHCCCS could use John’s annuity to cover Betty’s care costs, it could not use annuity funds for care costs Betty incurred after John’s death. The district court granted summary judgment to AHCCCS, holding the Medicaid Act allowed AHCCCS to use John’s annuity to cover all of Betty’s care costs. Rebecca appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Timlin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.