Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States

238 F.3d 1324 (2001)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
238 F.3d 1324 (2001)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

The federal government (defendant) solicited proposals from contractors to provide maintenance and groundskeeping services at the United States Naval Air Station in Sigonella, Italy (Sigonella base). Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi (Garufi) (plaintiff) and Joint Venture Conserv (JVC) both submitted proposals. JVC was comprised of four different business entities. Two of JVC’s entities, Impredil and Lara, had previously been controlled by Carmelo La Mastra but were placed into a receivership after Carmelo was indicted on criminal charges related to Mafia involvement and bid-rigging. The receivership was operated by a legal administrator, but Carmelo’s son, Salvatore La Mastra, held signatory power over both Lara and Impredil. Despite the receivership, Carmelo remained a corporate officer and signatory for Impredil. The government’s contracting officer (CO) found that JVC was a responsible contractor and awarded the contract to JVC. Garufi filed a bid protest in the United States Court of Federal Claims, arguing that the CO’s determination of JVC’s responsibility was arbitrary because JVC did not have a satisfactory record of business ethics and integrity. The government countered, arguing that the receivership imposed on Carmelo eliminated any control Carmelo had over JVC. The court denied Garufi’s bid protest. Garufi appealed to the Federal Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dyk, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership