In re Atlanta-Stewart Partners
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia
193 B.R. 79 (1996)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Atlanta-Stewart Partners (debtor) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1995. Atlanta-Stewart’s proposed reorganization plan classified Atlanta-Stewart’s creditors into five classes. Class 4 included unsecured creditors holding allowed claims of less than $1,000. Atlanta-Stewart proposed paying the Class 4 creditors 95 percent of their claims’ value. Equitable Life Insurance Company of Iowa (Equitable) (creditor) and the United States trustee objected to Atlanta-Stewart’s disclosure statement regarding the proposed reorganization plan. Equitable asserted that Atlanta-Stewart had artificially impaired Class 4 by proposing to pay 95 percent of the claims’ value instead of 100 percent. According to Equitable, if Atlanta-Stewart had not artificially impaired the class, Atlanta-Stewart would not have been able to satisfy the plan-confirmation requirement that at least one impaired class vote to accept Atlanta-Stewart’s plan. The United States trustee noted that paying the extra 5 percent to Class 4 would cost Atlanta-Stewart only $154.33. Atlanta-Stewart argued that it had not artificially impaired Class 4 and further asserted that even if it paid Class 4 in full, Class 4 would still be considered impaired under the 1994 amendments to 11 U.S.C. § 1124. The bankruptcy court considered the parties’ arguments in deciding whether to approve Atlanta-Stewart’s plan-disclosure statement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kahn, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

