In re Biolitec, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey
528 B.R. 261 (2014)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Biolitic, Inc. (Biolitic) (debtor), an affiliate of Biolitic AG (BAG), a German corporation, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. AngioDynamics (creditor) was Biolitic’s largest unsecured creditor. AngioDynamics had an outstanding $23 million judgment claim against Biolitic in addition to a pending fraudulent-transfer action in federal court against both Biolitic and BAG, which was ultimately decided in AngioDynamic’s favor. To ensure the honest administration of Biolitic’s bankruptcy estate, the court appointed a Chapter 11 trustee (the trustee) to administer it. The bankruptcy court approved a settlement between AngioDynamics and the trustee that set AngioDynamics’ unsecured claim against Biolitic at $29 million and sold the majority of Biolitic’s assets to AngioDynamics to satisfy the outstanding $23 million judgment claim. AngioDynamics also agreed that it would collect the remaining $6 million it was owed only if all other unsecured claims were paid first. Subsequently, AngioDynamics and the trustee filed for approval of a proposed structured-dismissal agreement that would dismiss Biolitic’s bankruptcy and create a liquidating trust to collect and distribute Biolitic’s remaining assets. Distribution from the liquidated trust would be handled by a new, nonbankruptcy trustee and would be subject to AngioDynamic’s review and consent. The proposed dismissal agreement also made BAG’s senior interests subordinate to all other allowed claims without BAG’s consent. BAG objected to the proposed dismissal agreement and moved for a Chapter 7 conversion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Steckroth, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.