In re Blendheim

803 F.3d 477 (2015)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Blendheim

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
803 F.3d 477 (2015)

Facts

Robert and Darlene Blendheim (debtors) filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and received a discharge of their unsecured debts. One day after the discharge, while the Chapter 7 case was still pending, the Blendheims filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition. The Blendheims thus became what are colloquially known as “Chapter 20 debtors” (i.e., 7 + 13). The Blendheims’ Chapter 13 schedule listed their home’s value as $450,000. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (HSBC) (creditor) held a first-position lien on the home securing a $347,900 debt. HSBC sought allowance of its claim in the Chapter 13 proceeding, but the Blendheims objected, asserting that HSBC had not properly documented its proof of claim. HSBC never responded to the objection, and the bankruptcy court disallowed HSBC’s claim. The Blendheims subsequently sought to void HSBC’s lien under 11 U.S.C. § 506(d). Section 506(d) provided that to the extent a lien secured a claim against a debtor that was “not an allowed secured claim,” the lien was void. The Blendheims asserted that HSBC’s lien was void because HSBC’s claim had been disallowed. HSBC moved for reconsideration of the disallowance order, but the bankruptcy court denied the motion and voided HSBC’s lien under § 506(d). During plan-confirmation proceedings, HSBC asserted that the lien needed to be reinstated upon completion of the Blendheims’ Chapter 13 plan. HSBC argued that the only way for the Blendheims to permanently void the lien would be through discharge, but under 11 U.S.C. § 1328(f), the Blendheims were ineligible for Chapter 13 discharge because they had obtained a Chapter 7 discharge within the previous four years. The bankruptcy court rejected HSBC’s argument and confirmed a Chapter 13 plan that allowed the Blendheims to permanently void HSBC’s lien once the plan was completed. The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court’s decision and also rejected HSBC’s argument that the Blendheims had not filed their Chapter 13 case in good faith because they filed while their Chapter 7 case remained pending. HSBC appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bybee, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership