In Re: Carnegie Center Associates

129 F.3d 290 (1997)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
I
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In Re: Carnegie Center Associates

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
129 F.3d 290 (1997)

  • Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD

Facts

Deborah Rhett (plaintiff), an African American woman, was a secretary at Carnegie Center Associates (defendant). In December 1990, Rhett informed Carnegie that she would be on maternity leave until April 1991. Rhett’s supervisors asked her whether she planned on marrying and advised her that it was the right thing to do. In the past, Carnegie had held two positions open for two employees on maternity leave pursuant to an informal policy that tried to hold jobs if possible. In March 1991, Carnegie terminated Rhett while she was on maternity leave. Carnegie needed to eliminate a secretarial position for economic reasons and chose Rhett because she was out of the office. Rhett sued Carnegie, alleging that her termination was a violation of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) amendment to Title VIII. The Bankruptcy Court dismissed her claim. The district court affirmed. Rhett appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Greenberg, J.)

Dissent (Mckee, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Gender and Sexuality

Key Terms