In re Carrsow-Franklin
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
524 B.R. 33 (2015)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Cynthia Carrsow-Franklin (debtor) went into bankruptcy. In 2010, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo) (creditor) filed a claim as the supposed holder of a loan to Carrsow-Franklin that was secured by a deed of trust. Attached to the claim were (1) a note from the year 2000, payable to Mortgage Factory Inc. and indorsed to ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc. (ABN Amro); (2) the deed of trust, also filed in 2000 and assigned from Mortgage Factory to ABN Amro; (3) an assignment of the deed of trust from ABN Amro to Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) as nominee for Washington Mutual Bank, FA, dated 2002; (4) documents from 2008 in which Wells Fargo appeared to obtain approval from the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, known as Freddie Mac, for modification of the loan; and (5) an assignment of mortgage from MERS to Wells Fargo, signed by John Kennerty on behalf of MERS and dated only three days before the claim itself in 2010. However, Kennerty was also an employee of Wells Fargo, where he worked as part of a team tasked with processing a large volume of loan documents. Carrsow-Franklin challenged Wells Fargo’s standing to assert the claim. In response, Wells Fargo filed a new claim that was identical to the previous one, except that a blank indorsement was added to the copy of the note. The blank indorsement appeared to give Wells Fargo the ability to enforce the note under Texas law. However, Carrsow-Franklin challenged the indorsement’s authenticity, suggesting that Wells Fargo had forged it. At trial, Kennerty’s testimony established that he signed multiple documents per day without really understanding their legal meaning or effect.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Drain, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.