Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

In re Chippendales USA, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
622 F.3d 1346 (2010)


Facts

In 1979, performers for Chippendales USA, Inc. (Chippendales) (plaintiff) began wearing tuxedo wrist cuffs and bowties without a shirt, known as the “Cuffs & Collar” costume. In 2000, Chippendales applied to register the Cuffs & Collar trade dress with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). Although the examining attorney did not find that the mark was inherently distinctive, the PTO registered the mark for “adult entertainment services, namely exotic dancing for women” because the mark had acquired distinctiveness through Chippendales’ five consecutive years of substantially exclusive and continuous use of the mark in commerce. In 2005, Chippendales filed to register the Cuffs & Collar mark again on the basis that it was inherently distinctive. The examining attorney found that the Cuffs & Collar mark was not inherently distinctive, and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) affirmed. The Board found that the Cuffs & Collar design was of the type commonly used by exotic dancers’ dressing in various provocative uniforms for their performances. Furthermore, because the Chippendales’ particular costume was inspired by and utilized similar features as the Playboy bunny suit, the Board found that this particular costume was not unique or unusual in this market. Chippendales appealed this decision.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Dyk, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.