In re Compagnie Generale Maritime
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
993 F.2d 841 (1993)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
Compagnie Generale Maritime (Maritime) (applicant), a French shipping company, applied to register the mark “French Line” for a variety of items. Maritime represented that its goods did not come from France. The examining attorney for the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) refused registration on the grounds that the mark was primarily geographically descriptive. On appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (board), Maritime argued that the mark was not primarily geographically descriptive but instead called to mind Maritime’s transatlantic, luxury-steamship passenger service and famous fleet of luxury ocean liners. The examining attorney presented evidence of newspaper clippings that discussed fashions and clothing from France as “French line(s)” and that referred to a brand of cosmetics from France as a “French line of cosmetics.” The board affirmed the refusal of registration, finding that potential purchasers of goods and services under the mark would believe that the goods and services came from France, rendering the mark primarily geographically descriptive to the extent that the goods and services did come from France and deceptively misdescriptive to the extent that they did not. Maritime appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Michel, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.