In re Estate of Wirtz
North Dakota Supreme Court
2000 N.D. 59, 607 N.W.2d 882 (2000)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Clarence Wirtz received Medicaid benefits for nursing home care through the North Dakota Department of Human Services (DHS) (plaintiff). Clarence was over the age of 55 and married to Verna Wirtz when he received Medicaid benefits. Clarence died in 1997, and Verna died in 1998. Verna never received Medicaid benefits. Clarence’s estate was not probated. Verna’s estate (defendant) was probated, and Vernon Caroline (defendant) was appointed as her estate’s personal representative. After Verna’s death, DHS filed a claim to recover Clarence’s medical costs from Verna’s estate, arguing that Verna’s entire estate was subject to Medicaid estate recovery because Clarence had a marital or equitable interest in Verna’s entire estate at the time of his death. The estate countered, arguing that Medicaid’s ability to recover from Verna’s estate was limited to assets transferred to Verna upon Clarence’s death through a life estate, joint tenancy, living trust, or survivorship account. The parties conceded that none of Clarence’s assets were transferred to Verna after Clarence’s death through a life estate, joint tenancy, living trust, or survivorship account. The trial court dismissed DHS’s petition, holding that DHS could not recover from Verna’s estate because Clarence did not have legal title or interest in any of Verna’s assets at the time of his death. DHS appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Neumann, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.