In re Featherworks Corp.

36 B.R. 460 (1984)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Featherworks Corp.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
36 B.R. 460 (1984)

Facts

Featherworks Corporation (debtor) bought and processed feathers and down. Featherworks filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. Walter E. Heller and Company (Heller) (creditor) held a $5 million lien on Featherworks’ inventory and accounts receivable. This collateral was worth only $3.5 million, leaving an unsecured deficiency of $1.5 million. Featherworks proposed a reorganization plan calling for unsecured creditors to receive 1.3 percent of their claims in cash. Heller and Farwest Garments, Inc. (Farwest) (creditor), another creditor, voted against the plan. After voting was complete, Heller petitioned the court to change its vote to an acceptance. Farwest objected, asserting that Heller had been paid $25,000 to change its vote in violation of Bankruptcy Code § 1126(e) and United States criminal law. Heller asserted that it had intended to accept the plan until it learned that Featherworks’ inventory was worth less than Featherworks had claimed. Heller said that it had therefore voted against the plan and filed suit for fraud against Featherworks, Featherworks’ president, and Featherworks’ parent company. Heller said it had accepted the $25,000 in payment for releases of liability in this second suit. Heller offered as evidence a letter in which it expressed its initial intent to vote in favor of the plan, but Heller did not offer evidence relating to its contention that the inventory was less valuable than Featherworks had claimed. The bankruptcy judge ruled that Heller’s change of vote was not in good faith and refused to allow Heller to change its vote. Featherworks appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Neaher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership