In re Gates
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Misc. Case No. 18-00301-KRH (2018)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Richard Gates (defendant) was a licensed attorney permitted to practice before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (the court) (plaintiff). Gates had repeated conflicts with the court’s security officers while going through security to enter the courthouse. On multiple occasions, Gates set off the magnetometer at the courthouse screening point. If an officer asked Gates to remove an item of clothing or submit to additional screening, Gates became verbally abusive, using profane and insulting language to demean the officers in front of the public. This behavior caused delays for other members of the public trying to enter. Security officers repeatedly reminded Gates that his behavior was unbecoming for a member of the bar. On one occasion, Gates angrily slammed his shoes into a screening container so hard that one bounced to the floor. Gates was then escorted to the courtroom by a United States marshal, who warned him that his behavior was unacceptable. Gates replied that he felt the screening procedures were too strict. On a separate day, after this warning, Gates set off a waist-level alarm on the magnetometer. The security officer asked Gates to remove his belt and undergo additional screening. Gates became verbally abusive, used extensive profanity, and forcibly flung his belt on the conveyor belt. The belt hit the arm of a woman in line behind him. The security officer apologized to the woman; Gates did not. The court issued an order to show cause to Gates, asking him to explain why he should not be disciplined for repeatedly directing disruptive and abusive behavior toward courthouse security when entering. The United States trustee presented evidence of Gates’s misbehavior, and Gates presented evidence on his own behalf. The court then considered whether to discipline Gates.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Huennekens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

