In re Guardianship of Karan
Washington Court of Appeals
38 P.3d 396 (2002)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Amanda Karan (plaintiff), a minor, was the beneficiary of her father’s life-insurance policy. Amanda’s mother hired attorney James Topliff (defendant) to help her petition for guardianship of Amanda’s estate following the death of Amanda’s father. The guardianship order did not comply with Washington’s statutes requiring that Amanda’s mother post a bond or that the estate funds be deposited into an account with blocked access. Amanda’s mother depleted three-quarters of the estate funds. After failing to recover on judgments against Amanda’s mother, Amanda’s new guardian sued Topliff for legal malpractice, alleging that Topliff owed Amanda a duty to ensure a bond or a blocked account. Topliff moved for summary judgment, arguing that he did not owe a duty of care to Amanda. The court granted summary judgment to Topliff. Amanda appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sweeney, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.