In re Jartran
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
732 F.2d 584 (1984)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Jartran, Inc. (defendant) operated a consumer truck-rental business. In September 1979, it arranged for the placement of ads in Yellow Pages directories nationwide. Jartran entered into a contract with Sandra C. Tinsley, Inc. (Tinsley) (plaintiff) and Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation (Donnelley) (plaintiff) whereby Tinsley would place Jartran’s orders with Donnelley, and Donnelley would then contract with individual Yellow Pages publishers. Each directory had a “closing date” at which point an ad could not be withdrawn. The actual publication of ads occurred several months after the closing date. The obligation to pay for ad space was irrevocably incurred upon the closing date, but Jartran was not billed until an ad was actually published. In December 1981, Jartran filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 and continued operation as the debtor-in-possession. When Jartran’s petition was filed, the closing dates for a number of ads had passed but publication had not yet occurred. Tinsley and Donnelley continued to perform services related to those ads, such as editing and communicating with publishers, in accordance with their contract with Jartran. The amount that Jartran owed for such ads was claimed to be $1,311,695.50. Tinsley and Donnelley applied to the bankruptcy court for treatment of that amount as a postpetition administrative expense. The court denied their request, and the district court affirmed. Tinsley and Donnelley appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cudahy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.