In re Joshua Slocum, Ltd.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
922 F.2d 1081 (1990)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
In 1983, Joshua Slocum, Ltd. (Slocum) (debtor) entered a 10-year lease with George Denney for retail space at Denney Block in Freeport, Maine. Denney Block consisted of three buildings—two adjacent and one separated by a courtyard—housing seven retail stores that sold different types of goods. Denney Block was in Freeport’s downtown shopping district, which consisted of several store-lined streets. Denney owned a parking lot primarily for use by Denney Block patrons and was the landlord for every Denney Block store. Denney’s lease with Slocum, like other Denney Block leases, contained an average-sales clause permitting Slocum or Denney to terminate the lease after six years if Slocum’s average yearly sales were below $711,245. The lease also contained a percentage-rent clause requiring Slocum to pay additional rent if Slocum’s gross sales exceeded a certain amount. In 1988, Slocum filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Slocum sought to assume and assign the Denney lease under 11 U.S.C. § 365. Denney objected, asserting that Denney Block was a shopping center for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 365(b)(3) and thus that there were heightened restrictions on lease assignment. The bankruptcy court found that Denney Block was not a shopping center because the stores were located on a street in a shopping district rather than enclosed in a typical shopping mall. The bankruptcy court authorized the bankruptcy trustee to assign the lease and excised (i.e., deleted) the average-sales clause from the lease before approving the assignment. The district court affirmed, and Denney appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Higginbotham, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.