In re Lionel Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
722 F.2d 1063 (1983)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Toy-train manufacturer Lionel Corporation (Lionel) (debtor) filed for reorganization under Bankruptcy Code Chapter 11. Lionel’s most valuable asset was its ownership of 82 percent of the common stock of Dale, an independent, profitable electronics company. The creditors’ committee in Lionel’s bankruptcy wanted Lionel to sell the Dale stock to finance an envisioned reorganization plan. Lionel filed an application in the bankruptcy court seeking permission under Bankruptcy Code § 363(b) to sell its Dale stock. Lionel also filed a reorganization plan conditioned on the stock’s sale. The bankruptcy judge confirmed the stock’s sale, finding that justification was sufficiently shown by the creditors’ committee’s insistence upon the sale and the fact that failing to confirm the sale would likely delay the reorganization process. The district court approved the bankruptcy judge’s order. A committee representing Lionel’s public shareholders appealed the sale order to the court of appeals, arguing that approving the sale prior to approving a reorganization plan deprived the equity holders of the Bankruptcy Code’s procedural safeguards, including disclosure, solicitation, and voting.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cardamone, J.)
Dissent (Winter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.