In re LTV Steel Co.
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio
274 B.R. 278 (2001)
LTV Steel Co. (LTV) was a large manufacturer of steel products. Abbey National (Abbey) (plaintiff) was a large financial institution. Abbey entered into an asset-based securitization agreement with LTV. Such agreements were created in an attempt to ensure to lenders that their collateral was excluded from the borrower’s bankruptcy estate in the event the borrower filed a bankruptcy petition. To effectuate this agreement, LTV created a subsidiary entity. LTV then entered into agreements with the subsidiary, which purported to sell all of LTV’s rights in its accounts receivables to the subsidiaries. Abbey then agreed to loan money to the subsidiary in exchange for the subsidiary granting Abbey a security interest in the receivables. LTV later filed for bankruptcy. LTV filed a motion in court seeking an order permitting it to use cash collateral. The cash collateral consisted of the receivables and inventory that were ostensibly owned by the subsidiary. LTV stated to the court that it would be forced to shut down if it did not receive authorization to use this cash collateral. LTV testified that there was sufficient equity cushion to provide adequate protection to its secured lenders. The bankruptcy court granted this motion. Abbey argued that the order should be modified because (1) there was no basis for the court to determine that the receivables that were Abbey’s collateral were property of LTV’s estate, and (2) even if the receivables were property of LTV’s estate, Abbey’s interests were not adequately protected because the receivables were diminishing at a rapid rate. The case was heard in state bankruptcy court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bodoh, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.