In re Netflix, Inc.

Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69279 (2013)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Netflix, Inc.

Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69279 (2013)

Facts

In January 2012, Netflix, Inc. (defendant) publicly announced that Netflix had streamed two billion total hours of content in the fourth quarter of 2011. Netflix’s chief executive officer, Reed Hastings, indicated that Netflix would update its streaming metric when milestones were reached but would not regularly report how many hours of content had been streamed. On July 3, 2012, Hastings posted on his personal Facebook page that Netflix’s monthly streaming had recently exceeded one billion hours for the first time. Hastings had roughly 200,000 Facebook followers, including shareholders, reporters, bloggers, and research analysts. Neither Netflix nor Hastings had previously posted company metrics on Hastings’s Facebook page. Rather, Netflix had always directed people to Netflix’s own Facebook page, Twitter feed, blog, and website for information. Hastings had not received input from Netflix’s legal department, investor-relations department, or chief financial officer prior to posting. Netflix did not make any other public announcements of the streaming milestone. However, Netflix sent Hastings’s post to some reporters, and the post was also picked up by a blog and other news outlets within two hours. The financial markets closed early on July 3, but several mainstream financial-reporting services picked up the story of Hastings’s post after the markets had closed. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigated whether Hastings’s post violated SEC Regulation FD and § 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which prohibit public companies or their representatives from selectively disclosing material, nonpublic information to securities professionals or shareholders before the information is made available to the general public. The SEC had issued guidance in 2008 explaining that a company makes a public disclosure of information when the information is distributed through a recognized channel. Following the investigation, the SEC issued a release clarifying how Regulation FD and the 2008 guidance applied to disclosures made on social media.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership