In re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.

Bankruptcy No. 81 B 10533 (1983)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
Bankruptcy No. 81 B 10533 (1983)

Facts

Mordecai Weissman founded O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc. (OPM) (debtor) in 1970. OPM’s name was a source of controversy and speculation during the years it was in operation. Principals sometimes said the initials stood for “other people’s machines” because OPM was in the business of computer leasing. However, the initials really stood for “other people’s money,” referring to the company’s practice of relying almost exclusively on funds advanced by others to run its business. Weissman and Myron Goodman, Weissman’s brother-in-law and business partner, engaged in large-scale fraud and deception to create an illusion of success while OPM lost money at ever increasing rates. Through ignorance, poor judgment, and self-interest, many financiers, lawyers, bankers, and other businesspeople worked with Goodman and Weissman in various ways that perpetuated OPM’s corrupt business. The law firm of Singer, Hutner, Levine & Seeman, P.C. (Singer Hutner) was OPM’s outside general counsel from 1971 through September 1980 and did not fully sever its relationship with OPM until December 1980. Andrew Reinhard, an associate and later partner with Singer Hutner, brought OPM’s business to the firm. Singer Hutner closed dozens of fraudulent lease-financing transactions for OPM and received fees of approximately $7.9 million from OPM during the representation. Substantial evidence suggested that although Reinhard may have been unaware of OPM’s fraudulent activities at the outset of the representation, he eventually became a knowing participant. In June 1980, Goodman confessed certain prior fraudulent activities to a Singer Hutner partner, and the firm engaged outside counsel to advise of its ethical responsibilities. However, Singer Hutner continued to close fraudulent lease financings for OPM without verifying or investigating the facts relevant to the transactions, and Goodman continued to downplay the scale of OPM’s fraudulent activities to the attorneys. With the approval of their ethics counsel, Singer Hutner voted to resign as OPM’s counsel in September 1980 but misleadingly characterized the resignation as a mutual decision between the firm and OPM. Singer Hutner’s ethics counsel advised that the firm could not ethically warn OPM’s successor counsel of the risk that Goodman would use them to help finance fraudulent transactions. OPM’s successor counsel then unwittingly helped close six additional fraudulent lease financings.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership