In re PW

391 B.R. 25 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re PW

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
391 B.R. 25 (2008)

Facts

PW, LLC, a real estate developer, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. At the request of DB Burbank, LLC (DB) (defendant), which held a senior $40 million claim against PW secured by almost all of PW’s assets, the bankruptcy court appointed Nancy Knupfer as trustee (the trustee) (defendant) in the case. Having concluded that PW’s property should be sold, the trustee entered into an agreement with DB whereby the property would be put up for bid and ultimately sold to DB for $41,434,465 if no bidder exceeded a specified price. The trustee moved the bankruptcy court to approve the sale of PW’s property free and clear of liens under 11 U.S.C. § 363(f)(3) and (f)(5). Over the objection of Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. (Clear Channel) (plaintiff), a junior lienholder with a $2.5 million claim against PW, the court entered an order approving the sale. No bidders met the minimum price and other terms. The bankruptcy court entered an order confirming the sale to DB and finding DB to be a purchaser in good faith. Clear Channel’s request for a stay of the order pending appeal was rejected by both the bankruptcy court and a motions panel of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP). The sale closed, and Clear Channel received nothing. Because DB purchased the PW property by credit bid, there were no proceeds to which Clear Channel’s lien could attach. Clear Channel appealed the sale and confirmation orders to the BAP.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Markell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership