Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

In re Rafter Seven Ranches, L.P.

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
546 F.3d 1194 (2008)


Facts

Rafter Seven Ranches, L.P. (Rafter) (defendant) purchased four used sprinkler systems from Ochs Irrigation (Ochs). C.H. Brown Company (Brown) (plaintiff) agreed to finance the purchase through lease agreements providing that Ochs would supply and install the sprinklers. Rafter authorized Brown to send lease payments to Ochs immediately, as the sprinklers were required for a planting season that would end on May 1. However, the first sprinkler system was not delivered and installed until late July and did not comply with the terms of the lease. Rafter used the sprinkler system in an effort to mitigate crop losses. Ochs delivered two more nonconforming systems. At the time of delivery, Rafter inspected the sprinklers, found them to be “junk,” and told Ochs to remove them. Ochs did not remove the sprinkler systems, which were left uninstalled in the fields. Ochs never delivered the fourth system. About six weeks later, Rafter notified Brown that the lease payments would not be made, and filed for Chapter 12 bankruptcy. Brown filed a claim in Rafter’s bankruptcy case to recover the lease payments. The bankruptcy court overruled Rafter’s objection, concluding that Rafter had accepted the sprinkler systems and failed to reject the systems in a timely manner. Rafter’s motion to reconsider was denied. Rafter appealed to the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP), which affirmed. Rafter again appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Seymour, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence/Dissent (Lucero, J.)

The concurrence/dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the judge’s concurrence in part and dissent in part.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.