In re Riggs

2006 WL 2990218 (2006)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Riggs

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri
2006 WL 2990218 (2006)

Facts

Rebecca Ann Riggs (debtor) filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Riggs owned a 1993 Ford Explorer on which Super Cars, Inc. held a lien. Riggs indicated that she intended to reaffirm her debt to Super Cars. Riggs signed and submitted for the bankruptcy court’s approval a reaffirmation agreement for a debt of $4,822.69 with an annual interest rate of 18.9 percent. Part C of the reaffirmation agreement allowed Riggs’s attorney to swear that Riggs was fully informed and advised of the consequences of reaffirming the debt, that Riggs entered the agreement voluntarily, and that the agreement did not impose an undue hardship on Riggs. However, Riggs’s attorney did not sign Part C. Because the attorney had not signed, the bankruptcy court was required to analyze the agreement and its potential consequences before the court could approve the agreement.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Federman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership