In re Sexson

613 N.E.2d 841 (1993)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...

In re Sexson

Indiana Supreme Court

613 N.E.2d 841 (1993)

Facts

Attorney David Sexson (defendant) maintained an office at the same location as attorney Rollin Thompson and four other attorneys. The attorneys all shared office space, a secretary, and three telephone lines; used a common letterhead; and left their individual offices unlocked and the doors open. The file cabinets of all attorneys were visible from a common hallway, and conversations in individual offices could be heard in the hallway. Thompson was retained to file a personal-injury claim on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Zimmerman. Mr. Zimmerman subsequently filed an action for dissolution of marriage. Mrs. Zimmerman retained Sexson to represent her in the dissolution proceeding. After Thompson settled the Zimmermans’ personal-injury case, Sexson obtained on behalf of Mrs. Zimmerman an ex parte order restraining Mr. Zimmerman from negotiating his settlement check. Mr. Zimmerman arranged with Thompson to pick up his settlement check at Thompson’s office and was met by Sexson and served with the restraining order. Sexson was charged with engaging in representation of a client that was directly adverse to the interests of another client in violation of the Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law (RPCs) 1.7(a) and 1.10(a).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,200 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership