Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

In re Si Restructuring, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
532 F.3d 355 (2008)


Facts

John and Jeffrey Wooley (the Wooleys) (creditors) were officers, directors, and principle shareholders of Schlotzsky’s, Inc. (debtor). The Wooleys loaned the company $1,000,000 in April 2003 and $2,500,000 in November 2003. The loans were secured by the company’s franchise income and other rights. At the time, Schlotzsky’s had been in financial trouble and unable to obtain other financing. By the time of the November loan, the company’s financial situation had deteriorated, necessitating the Wooleys’ loan to be arranged and approved in a matter of days. The board approved the loans and subjected the loans to independent audits. In addition to being secured by the company’s franchise income, the November loan also secured personal guarantees the Wooleys had for $4,300,000 in pre-existing company debt. In 2004, the Wooleys were removed as officers of the company and resigned from the board. Schlotzsky’s filed for bankruptcy later that year. The Wooleys filed secured claims with the bankruptcy court for both loans. The committee of unsecured creditors challenged the Wooleys’ right to be treated as secured creditors. The bankruptcy court held that the Wooleys had engaged in inequitable conduct and ordered that their claims for both the April and November loans be equitably subordinated and converted from secured to unsecured claims. The district court upheld the bankruptcy court’s ruling, and the Wooleys appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Davis, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.