In re Smith
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Georgia
2008 WL 7390623 (2008)
- Written by Sheryl McGrath, JD
Facts
Marvin and Sharon Smith (debtors) signed a promissory note to a bank for funding construction of a house. The house was to be constructed as real estate on a Georgia island. The Smiths also signed a deed transferring the real estate to the bank. The deed applied to “all existing and future improvements, structures, fixtures, and replacements that may now, or at any time in the future, be part of the real estate.” The bank assigned the deed to Atlantic Southern Bank (Atlantic Southern) (creditor). After the island house was constructed, the Smiths had a chandelier installed in the foyer of the house. There was recessed lighting in the foyer, but the Smiths had previously purchased the chandelier and decided to have it installed in the house foyer for decoration. The Smiths had from time to time bought other chandeliers and had moved chandeliers from home to home. Sometime later, the Smiths filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, which was subsequently converted to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. During the bankruptcy proceeding, the Smiths removed the chandelier from the island house. Removal involved unclipping the electrical wiring and detaching the chandelier from the hanging chain. Atlantic Southern then foreclosed on the island house. Separately, the bankruptcy trustee proposed to sell the chandelier at auction. Atlantic Southern objected to the sale and claimed ownership of the chandelier as a fixture of the island house.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dalis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.