From our private database of 31,100+ case briefs...
In re T.J.S.
New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
16 A.3d 386 (2011)
TJS and his infertile wife, ALS (the spouses) (plaintiffs) entered into an agreement with AF (the surrogate), who consented to act as a gestational carrier. The spouses arranged to have anonymously donated ova fertilized in vitro with the husband’s sperm. Two viable human embryos were implanted into the surrogate’s uterus. The spouses filed suit for a pre-birth declaration of parentage under the New Jersey Parentage Act (parentage act). The spouses asked that their names be listed as parents on the resulting child’s birth certificate and that the surrogate not be listed as the child’s mother. The trial court ordered that the birth certificate list the spouses as the child’s parents once the surrogate officially surrendered her rights 72 hours following the birth. The child was born, and the surrogate surrendered her rights 72 hours later. The State Registrar (defendant) moved to vacate the trial court’s order that the wife be listed as the mother on the child’s birth certificate. The trial court concluded that the parentage act did not allow the wife to be declared as the child’s mother through a pre-birth order; the wife’s only option was stepparent adoption of the child under state law. The trial court ruled that the parentage act did not violate the wife’s equal-protection rights under the New Jersey Constitution by providing for the presumptive paternity of an infertile husband but not the presumptive maternity of an infertile wife, as argued by the spouses. The trial court granted the registrar’s motion to vacate the order listing the wife as the mother on the child’s birth certificate. The spouses appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Parrillo, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 557,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 557,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 31,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.