In re Termination of Parental Rights to Thomas J.S.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
262 Wis. 2d 217 (2003)
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
Tammie J.C. (plaintiff) and Robert T.R. (defendant) were married in Wyoming in 1987. Tammie’s daughter from a previous marriage lived with them, and Tammie and Robert had a son, Thomas, together in 1988. In 1991 the family moved to Arizona. In 1992 Tammie’s daughter accused Robert of sexual assault, and Tammie took her daughter and Thomas and returned to Wyoming. Robert was convicted of sexual assault in Arizona and sentenced to 10 years in prison in Arizona. Robert filed for divorce in Arizona, and the court awarded sole custody of Thomas to Tammie, denying Robert visitation rights. Tammie moved again, eventually settling in Wisconsin in 1996, where she remarried her daughter’s biological father. In 2000 Tammie filed a petition in Wisconsin state court to terminate Robert’s parental rights, and Tammie’s husband filed a petition to adopt Thomas. Robert received notice of the petition, and the court granted Robert’s motion to delay the trial until Robert was released from prison. Robert moved to dismiss the petition, arguing that because he had never even been to Wisconsin, Wisconsin lacked personal jurisdiction over him. The Wisconsin court granted the parties time to resolve jurisdiction in Arizona. The Arizona court declined to exercise jurisdiction, because Thomas was not present in Arizona. Following a trial in which Robert participated by telephone, the Wisconsin court terminated Robert’s parental rights, finding that the termination was in Thomas’s best interests. Robert appealed, arguing Wisconsin lacked personal jurisdiction. The court of appeals held that Wisconsin did not have personal jurisdiction and reversed the termination order. Tammie appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bradley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.